Hello NeiroInfoOnX,
I feel the need to make a few things crystal clear here. I provide images at the bottom of this comment.
- Binance
Binance currently holds 69 %, not 56 % (see IMG 1 or just use bubblemaps). This is unusual. Defido showed a cluster of wallets. Let’s abstain from ad hominem arguments here and focus on the metrics of decentralization.
These on-chain interactions also raise questions about the decentralization of this project which have yet to be answered (I’m sorry for dodging the rules here, but please delete the squared brackets):
x[.]com/bropumparmy/status/1863407954847769074?s=46
One theory on Binance’s strategy has been pointed out by Pikachu, a former member of NeiroCTO:
x[.]com/EylemAkbas3/status/1844800575055032472
For context on that:
x[.]com/FiatBurnerr/status/1832157058487197912
- Suspicious strategies by S_pcptree
I am curious as to why S_pcptree, the leading figure in your project, claims in this forum discussion that he made
"decisions […] based on a set of values rather than trying to “get ahead”
for NeiroCTO.
It seems a bit out of place since he purposely ignored the shady business of GotBit, as Zachxbt pointed out:
x[.]com/zachxbt/status/1844786126600438172
In the discussion with Zach, S_pcptree mentioned he
“had only a tiny amount of funds to spend on MM”
How could a low Market Cap CTO raise millions of dollars for Market Making of the various exchanges, i wonder? Or the 44 ETH in tokens that were sent to Vitalik?
Maybe the viral investigative post from @Kiththeking, whose account has been banned due to mass reports, provides answers. We own blurred screenshots but this recreation will do a better job:
- Treatment of investigative voices and questions
Attempts to have a constructive and fruitful discussion lead to blocking and mass reporting our community members way too often. Many people are wondering if your project is infact a CTO and ran by a community.
I believe we all agree that the memecoin narrative of $Neiro should be in the hands of the many people that cherish Neiro, especially when we are talking about intellectual property 
- Paying for KOLs and a suspicious Bubblemaps
donation
We also want to understand if NeiroCTO believes is appopriate to pay a Binance intern for shilling your project (see IMG 2.1), and if it’s appropiate to do so while repeatedly claiming that they would not pay for KOLs (see IMG 2.2).
On a side note, I’m unsure which community would allow that the Dexscreener banner still says “First Neiro on Ethereum”, when another Neiro token was minted seconds before (see IMG 3, also etherscan[.]io/txs?block=20400503&p=3).
Questions about a 50K $ donation from S_pcptree to bubblemaps are being shut down, as I recorded here:
x[.]com/O_O_C_A/status/1845942338310336675
Since these crucial concerns for retail investors’ safety rarely meet open ears, transparency, or just any explanations, I question the legitimacy of this project as a “CTO”.
- Side note on NeiroOnEthereum
Melardev already listed a great deal of evidence on the centralization of another token - NeiroOnEthereum - here. I just want to quickly add to these great findings. For some reason they repeatedly used botted replies, as shown here:
x[.]com/O_O_C_A/status/1835082742159282627/
It’s also astonishing to me how a supposed community project would ever work together with the unprofessional DFWLabs.
Closing remarks
The loud community that cherishes Neiro is behind the token that launched first, as it is usually the case by nature!
Lastly, FiatBurner, a respected member of the BroPump community, can’t post in this forum for now, but please feel free to take the time to read this tweet too!
Thank you all for engaging here!!
x[.]com/FiatBurnerr/status/1869448451131338759
#BroPump 
#ProvenanceMatters
