Hello to all the lovers of KABOSU and NEIRO,
I would like to start this post by thanking everyone who has taken the time to participate in this discussion.
Your dedication to the future success of NEIRO and the preservation of its IP shines through.
Before diving into the main topic of this post which is undoubtedly longer than previous ones but far more significant in its content I would like to address an important point.
Some individuals have raised concerns about others sharing personal emotions and stories instead of focusing directly on the IP.
To these individuals, I want to respond from the heart :
In the near future, we may very well find ourselves working together on a different topic if your love for the dog surpasses your attachment to the token.
For this reason, sharing our personal journeys is crucial. It fosters understanding among us and adds context to the ideas we bring forward.
When we understand each other better, we are better equipped to work together to achieve meaningful outcomes.
If like me, you are passionate about DOGE and its values, you’ll understand that these words stem from a desire to put humanity above all else.
Now that I’ve addressed this topic close to my heart, let’s dive into the core subject of this post.
I. THE SO-CALLED FUD
This term has been wielded like a weapon by some self-proclaimed NEIRO CTO supporters against members of the Bropump community.
I take these accusations personally, especially because I endured them daily with my previous X account (now banned), where I shared numerous investigations related to NEIRO.
Under each post, the same comments appeared over and over :
“Why do you keep spreading FUD about NEIRO CTO?”
The truth is, my investigations were never meant to attack but to seek answers about the strange and questionable aspects of the project.
It’s easy to hide behind the powerful term “FUD” to avoid confronting the real issues.
So here I am, using this platform to directly address the “NEIRO CTO” community and finally demand answers.
Additionally, I want to pose this question to the OTD community :
Could this behavior if proven harm Atsuko and her legacy?
Because this IP represents more than just intellectual property. It embodies the integrity and responsibility of those who manage it.
II. TROUBLING LINKS BETWEEN : NEIRO CTO, MOODENG, POCHITA, DOGGO, MISHA, TERMINUS
This investigation began after I was contacted by dozens of people who claimed to have been scammed in projects like these.
One by one, they shared evidence suggesting potential links between these entities.
Unfortunately, I cannot provide screenshots of these testimonies as they were shared in private DMs on X before my previous posts reached millions of views.
However, this doesn’t diminish the weight of the claims.
This topic resonated deeply within the crypto ecosystem and gained significant visibility because it was shared immediately by others who had long been ignored after publicly speaking out.
III. 70% OF THE SUPPLY CONTROLLED BY A SINGLE ACTOR
It is an on-chain fact that can be easily confirmed using tools like Bubble Maps.
70% of NEIRO CTO’s tokens are controlled by a single actor Binance.
• Here’s the issue :
These tokens are not owned by individual users holding NEIRO CTO on Binance.
Instead, Binance itself controls them, acting like a bank with a “promise of deposit” system.
• This raises a major concern :
If Binance were to face a crisis similar to the 2008 banking collapse or the FTX crash in 2022, your assets would no longer be in your possession.
This completely contradicts the ethos of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or DOGE.
Which were created to allow individuals to own their assets on-chain, without intermediaries. (True decentralization)
• As the cypherpunks famously said :
“Not your keys, not your tokens.”
The systemic risk represented by NEIRO CTO in my view is far too great to ignore.
Particularly when it involves the legacy of Atsuko and the responsibility of OTD.
• This leads us to ask :
Is this effectively a Binance takeover?
What’s more troubling is Binance’s aggressive marketing campaign to position NEIRO CTO as the “next DOGE.”
Personally I find this idea absurd.
NEIRO and DOGE are radically different with unique identities, personalities, and reasons for existing.
III. COLLABORATION WITH RISKY ACTORS
NEIRO CTO associations with the following entities raise serious concerns :
• GOTBIT :
This company is under investigation by the SEC for what may be the largest case of wash trading and money laundering in crypto history.
Projects collaborating with GOTBIT are directly implicated in these grave accusations.
• DWFLABS :
Involved in major wash trading and market manipulation scandals in 2023.
The damage is estimated at $300 million, making headlines across crypto-focused media and even the Wall Street Journal.
• BINANCE :
Implicated in multiple scandals, including the wash trading facilitated on its platform.
Furthermore, the SEC investigation in 2023 led to its iconic CEO’s imprisonment, which many believe was an attempt to scapegoat him and avoid systemic risk to the platform itself.
Can such an actor be trusted, especially when they hold 70% of NEIRO CTO’s supply?
• JUSTIN SUN :
Justin Sun is under SEC investigation and is widely regarded as one of the most controversial figures in crypto.
His public endorsement of NEIRO CTO when it was still relatively unknown raises questions.
Additionally, his history of promoting manipulated tokens like BABY DOGE, SUNDOG, ect… fuels further suspicion.
The collaborations and support from Chinese organizations and personalities following Justin Sun’s involvement only add to the mystery.
IV. TROUBLING LINKS WITH BUBBLE MAPS
The Bubble Maps tool is widely respected for its ability to provide transparency and enable on-chain investigations.
However, its connection to NEIRO CTO and Binance raises potential conflicts of interest.
Consider these facts:
Binance partnered with Bubble Maps to analyze on-chain data for low-cap tokens to be listed on its platform.
Bubble Maps received a “donation” of $50,000 in NEIRO CTO tokens, which would be worth significantly more at its ATH.
Here are my questions:
• Why hasn’t Bubble Maps flagged the 70% supply concentration under Binance?
• Why hasn’t Bubble Maps reported suspicious capital movements linked to NEIRO CTO before its Binance listing?
• Could Bubble Maps’ partnership with Binance prevent them from revealing negative findings about NEIRO CTO?
• Does this “donation” represent a potential bribe to silence criticism?
Unfortunately, attempts to raise these questions publicly have been dismissed as FUD or even censored.
V. THE ETHICS OF CHARITY
Charity is a sensitive topic, but it must be addressed honestly.
The essence of charity is giving without expecting anything in return. However NEIRO CTO approach raises ethical concerns:
• Why ask for recognition in exchange for donations?
• Why display banners with the token’s branding during events?
• Why distribute merchandise featuring the token’s logo at donation events?
While I commend the help provided to those in need, it’s important to acknowledge that these actions involved an exchange of value visibility in return for donations.
From an ethical perspective, this does not align with the values of true charity.
For me, charity should never be a tool for personal gain or visibility. It should be a selfless act to help others.
VI. PROTECTING THE LEGACY OF ATSUKO AND NEIRO
To those asking what the Bropump community stands for, the answer is simple :
We are here to protect the legacy of Atsuko, KABOSU, and NEIRO.
This means exposing those who exploit their image for personal gain, even if it means facing backlash.
For me, this fight began when Atsuko publicly expressed her disappointment about how some people were tarnishing her image and the legacy of her dog NEIRO.
This, like for many in our community was the trigger for our quest for truth not for financial gain, but to preserve what truly matters.
We will continue to speak out and protect Atsuko’s legacy, no matter the obstacles.
Thank you for reading