TBH, interested to hear what you think really matters in relation to Neiro narrative? Wasn’t an attack btw, if you read it again it’s pointing out the transparency was higher on Neiro ETH (not the “cto”).
15 Likes
Presenting the truth is not an attack. It is a defense.
Please understand that this entire situation goes beyond any single one of us, and taking those truths personally is not constructive.
16 Likes
Interesting read on what Grok thinks regarding the proposals:
Given the options presented and the goals of the $DOG team in collaboration with Atsuko, here’s a speculative analysis of each choice:
-
NeiroWoof/Bropump: This option offers a community-driven approach, which could resonate well with a DAO’s ethos, especially with a focus on community support and charity. However, with the lowest market cap among the options, the financial benefits might not be as substantial unless community involvement significantly boosts the token’s value or utility.
-
NeiroCTO: This token has a significantly higher market cap, suggesting a more established presence in the market. The proposal includes locked tokens, revenue sharing, and marketing support, which could be very appealing for ensuring long-term benefits for both Atsuko and the DAO. The financial commitment through locked tokens and revenue sharing provides a clear, tangible benefit.
-
Launching an Official Neiro Token: This would give the DAO full control over the IP and monetization strategy, potentially maximizing benefits for Atsuko. However, this would require significant resources to establish the token’s credibility and market value from scratch, which might not be immediately feasible or attractive compared to leveraging an existing community and infrastructure.
-
Do Nothing: This option risks leaving the IP vulnerable to further exploitation by unofficial tokens and might not serve Atsuko’s interests in monetizing her brand effectively.
Considering the goals of supporting Atsuko and ensuring she benefits from her IP, NeiroCTO seems like the most financially and strategically beneficial choice. It offers immediate financial commitments, long-term revenue sharing, and additional marketing support, which could help in promoting and protecting the Neiro brand effectively. The established market cap also suggests a degree of stability and investor confidence that could be leveraged for further growth.
However, this is speculative, and the actual decision would depend on various factors including community feedback, strategic priorities of the DAO, and Atsuko’s personal input. If you’re looking for a prediction, I would lean towards NeiroCTO, but the community’s vote will be the definitive answer.
I modify my post to add the tweet where I read it.
3 Likes
this is laughable. i have got exactly opposite of what you have written. There can be hundreds of different responses.
What i got is like #bropump is best choise, because potential for token price to go is very high and that 7% supply gives biggest financial stability compared to others. Also value brought us by community is best among all options. I even got reference from “Scam” label based on X tweets in past for NeiroCTO.
14 Likes
Interesting response from chatGPT:
Option 1: NeiroWoof / “Bropump”
Key Reasons for Choosing NeiroWoof:
1. Strong Community Support
NeiroWoof has an active and engaged community that has consistently supported Atsuko and the DAO’s mission.
2. No Signs of Market Manipulation
Unlike other options, NeiroWoof has shown no evidence of centralized control or suspicious token movements, making it a transparent and trustworthy project.
3. Community-Funded Contribution
The 7% token allocation comes from community donations, showing genuine commitment rather than speculative investment.
4. Focus on Real-World Impact
Their plan to develop a charity app aligns with Atsuko’s values and ensures that the Neiro brand is used positively.
Option 2: NeiroCTO
Serious concerns have arisen regarding NeiroCTO, making it a high-risk choice for this agreement.
Concerns About NeiroCTO:
1. Massive Token Transfer to Binance
The fact that 70% of its supply was moved to Binance at listing raises serious concerns about decentralization and potential manipulation. No reputable project operates this way.
2. Speculative Investor Influence
Reports suggest that NeiroCTO may be orchestrated by a group of Chinese speculators, raising doubts about its long-term sustainability.
3. Warnings from Crypto Influencers
Several notable figures in the crypto space have labeled NeiroCTO as a potential scam or Ponzi scheme, which cannot be ignored.
Option 3: Launch Our Own, Official Neiro Token
While launching an official token may seem like a direct way to control the Neiro brand, it comes with significant risks and challenges:
1. Community Fragmentation – The existing Neiro projects already have established communities. Introducing a new token could divide support rather than consolidate it.
2. Resource Intensive – Managing a new token requires significant development, legal, and financial resources, which may be better spent on strengthening existing partnerships.
3. Competitive Disadvantage – Competing with already established Neiro projects could result in reduced adoption and market confusion, ultimately weakening the brand instead of strengthening it.
Option 4: Do Nothing
No agreements will be made, and the DAO will not officially endorse any Neiro project.
Given these considerations, launching an official Neiro token is not the most effective path forward. Instead, partnering with NeiroWoof ensures immediate support, strong community backing, and sustainable growth for the Neiro brand.
15 Likes
This seems that it was written by you…
Hi everyone,
As a dog lover and a true fan of Neiro, I stand firmly with #Bropump Neiro Woof. There’s no speculation here—Neiro Bropump represents a genuine community that is actively engaged daily in raids on the X platform.
The idea of voting to decide which Neiro gets the IP is great, and I support it. However, I don’t agree with the principle that I need to buy $DOG tokens to make my vote more valuable. To me, that’s nonsense, and it only ensures that the Binance-based “cabals” will win again—not because they have a real community, but because they can invest large amounts of money and buy up tokens. I want to support the DOG community and Neiro community, this seems a little unfair to me, you’re pitting the common man against the machine.
Why must voting be influenced by who has the most money? Why can’t it be based on supporting a genuine community—especially the first Neiro on the blockchain?
Wishing you all a great day—that’s my personal opinion.
Big Cego
27 Likes
TBH the whole idea of deducing this down with AI based on a script and not all the facts is kind of a moronic idea to begin with. 
19 Likes
IMO, it’s quite interesting because it analyzes the proposals without any bias
2 Likes
No, it’s a ChatGPT response. I just told him to look up the facts online. I agree that giving this task to an AI is stupid, I only did it in response to his post.
20 Likes
Grok doesn’t sniff out the human fraud tactics like buying and dumping by a certain person from the core team and other tactics that were used to get an unfair advantage.
That’s why we still have hooomans as CEOs and in other positions, we don’t have Grok as the CEO of our enterprises, why is Elon Musk the head of all the companies he RUNS!!! he had Grok created but he runs the company and that’s why I don’t have any value judgment with all the LLM models
The Hoooman runs the show!! Still
22 Likes
“Meme are for everybody not for a few” so everyone can win brother! 
7 Likes
Hi everyone,
I may be overthinking this, but I have a question that needs clarification:
How can NEIRO « CTO » be considered decentralized and risk-free when 70% of its supply is held by a centralized intermediary like Binance?
Some might argue that these tokens technically belong to the clients and not the exchange.
However, as the OGs of Bitcoin remind us:
« Not your keys, not your tokens. »
The entire philosophy behind Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency movement was rooted in disintermediation.
The goal was to eliminate reliance on centralized entities, like banks, to store wealth, thus avoiding catastrophic failures like the 2008 financial crisis.
This vision inspired Satoshi Nakamoto to create Bitcoin with one mission:
Granting people true financial freedom through ownership of their assets.
So, when a memecoin has the majority of its supply controlled by a centralized intermediary, isn’t it exposing itself to the same systemic risks?
For example, if the exchange collapses like FTX, 70% of the token supply could vanish overnight a risk too significant to ignore.
Additionally, such concentration of control enables potential market manipulation, especially by Binance, given the availability of perpetual contracts tied to the token.
More importantly, this contradicts the very essence of decentralization the idea of empowering people with control over their financial destiny.
DOGE as the leading memecoin, has been a shining example of this philosophy.
So, why not replicate this success with its sister, NEIRO?
BROPUMP NEIRO currently upholds these decentralization principles, with only 3% of its supply held by centralized intermediaries.
In my opinion, before entertaining any proposals, we must ensure that these decentralization standards are met to honor the values of DOGE and Satoshi.
True ownership in crypto starts with decentralization and self-custody well before IP agreements.
Giving the IP to NEIRO « CTO » would effectively hand it over to Binance, a single centralized entity, undermining the values we stand for.
24 Likes
I have to comment on this one to @Rechenknecht (reply of his reply), first of all, I am neutral, not holding any.
That FUD is baseless, CryptoRugMunch has been attacking ETHCTO since inception with baseless arguments, I personally debunked his first image (main cluster was an unlabelled Uniswap V3 LP), and asked the addresses/txs of the second image as I couldn’t reproduce it, he didn’t give any, and he said he wasn’t able to reproduce it anymore, which is still a negligence as such accusation should always be done verifying things manually first. At hindsight I believe that cluster is Binance, the reason why I wasn’t able to reproduce is because by default recognized CEXs are hidden, you have to manually show them, which I believe is what he did at first, then he forgot and wasn’t able to reproduce it again, I suspect that because bubblemaps v1 will show a similar cluster if you enable Binance CEX, but CEXes clusters are not relevant. Now Bubblemaps v2 is closed so it’s not possible to go back, but v1 is still available for everyone to check.
Bubblemaps’s resaearcher also corrected him:
Relevant replies:
2 Likes
You’re absolutely not neutral, you’ve had pro Neiro CTO articles on the main account, bypassed any questioning of the facts, always defended and in fact attacked any independent researchers, talked about how you put a long in at around $330-360m that then got deleted once it dumped down to $280.
The same article you’ve linked to back up your article (which is a Bubblemaps researcher/employee) says himself that he believes there is likely a link to a Binance employee and that it “Looks like other bundled projects”
“Neutral”…
This person works for Bubble maps and they’re saying this (you linked it as your argument), BUBBLEMAPS the people that your token paid $50,000 in tokens too, which went to hundreds of thousands. But when asked about the donation? Of course, crickets. This is the transparency issue that plagues this token and is what the market broadly has issue with. This is the NEIRO narrative, not some random ticker.
How is this token even up for discussion in relation to what is ‘right’ in crypto or what is ‘good’ for the LEGACY of DOGE or DOG is beyond me. The facts, the understanding by the market and the general damage it can do to the DOG and DOGE brands is HUGE.
Think multi cycle outside of just Neiro for a moment. These things being true above are now even more important.
Here’s the link for those that like to do research on what they invest in: x.com
23 Likes
You are not neutral and neither are you a reliable source.
You are paid to write these things for the Neiro " Cto ". You have also been defending their lead kol gg1nvestments who wrote a public tweet apologising for all the rugs and pump and dumps he did since Neiro “Cto”.
A quick search on X about that kol will let you know everything about his schemes.
Bubblemaps has blocked over 20 members of Bropump community for asking the same question, given the experience with them I believe at this point they could have altered/shut down their log as it is strangely not being reproduced citing their V2 not running properly after the Cryptorugmunch tweet… Wonders;)
10 Likes
These images are from days/ weeks before Neiro"Cto" was listed on binance so you are not factually correct on that either.
The second image is without the Dex as you could still see major connections between the wallets.
P s Check dates at the top in these images
11 Likes
Hi all!
I’m pretty new to the whole memecoin market, I recently joined the Neirowoof community, mostly because of how extremely active their community is. There’s always something going on.
I think this whole IP nonsense has really caused a stir, I even have people fighting me on X for pointing out discrepancies with ShibuCTO, when I’m just doing research? It’s what I like to do. I love crypto!
But attacking each other aside, can there be 2 Neiros? 3? 5? I don’t think fighting each other is really going to make any difference?
The community I’m largely apart of with Fantoumi, is considerably more focused on the happier side of things, real charity and helping people and animals alike, he’s already got support from the whole DOGE community and Kabusomama, and it hasn’t done jack shit for us 
. Nobody really cares.
It’s better to just focus on the good, than everyone fighting over money. I’m planning on putting money in Neiro and OTD as well because everyone seems to have a long-term commitment (and not even because of the vote, fuck the vote).
With real communities, at least you know you’re not going to rugged? It’s why I’ve stuck by Fantoumi for so long, because he’s actually in it to win it!
Why not support each other instead of fighting? I’m over it.
(I saw a post from one of the community members, and I was like, “Fuck yeah! This guy gets it!!”, end the fighting)
12 Likes
It is interesting that about 95% of the comments so far are from Bro Pump, and the IP discussion was about the same, maybe a little less. The proof is in the pudding 
TBH at this point if you’re not going to pick bro pump, please just save face and don’t pick anyone or make your own token at least it will be of pure not like the ones on eth.
11 Likes
You have hidden the most important part of his response, at the end what matters is evidence, and that’s what he said. Speculation we can all speculate. Putting it for the record.
Notice how Ocelot is neutral, and has openly expressed his opinions, meanwhile CryptoRugMunch has never given an explanation on why bringing FUD (which btw was raided by NeiroOnEthereum cabal) without being able to defend his thesis with addresses/txs, to this day he lost the argument fight, all he is left with is Bubblemaps images than even Bubblemaps say they aren’t enough to suspect anything.
2 Likes